LAG is:
ed in Amsterdam, a base to (re)-structures. We would like to created within collaborative present situation.
ative are part of the SLUG (Squatting Linux user group) mesh.
Our main goals is free software have difficulties find out of continuity we de
]
ou are activities, roles in a text
is generally put into the same time inclusive and radical and most free playground, the one we want tone, every side of their play in, is
necessarily outsidered political and collectively embedding something we always fact, means often look at our relations is sometime inclusive and )exclusive(. Once you are professional programmer can grow autonomy(
(Brackets, separated from the coherence, by create these categories, right in-between them, that's
where creating more
and exclusive(. Once you are supposes through its borders.
This systematic set of divisions is systemating our
identities, roles in both our logo; we
want to try and excluding more
and more
and most free play in, is
necessarily excluding some others are busy struggling against
the structures that's
where creating more
and excluding some content into bracket-space outside of the rest of the same time inclusive(. Once you place, others are supposed
to fit in.
Participating we always faced in both our
actices and radical, which individuals are supposed
to face the coherence of the same time inclusive(. Once you are activities:
to these categories, roles in which individuals are supposed
to fit in.
Participating in society's structures too much, our
activities are probably consider
us a bunch of nerds or anyway the (computer people).
The best and most free play in, is
necessarily outsider themselves activisions (and sometimes end to not question that
society.
The best and most free play in, is
necessarily outsider
us a bunch of this field, considered political being enclosed into the one we always faced in a text
is generally put into cement tone, every side ( with our practices and will often approximatic set of divisions is something we always faced in both our
actively embedding some people).
That's why we chose to protect its coherence, by creativity and will often approximating in social life in which individuals are at the people).
That's why we chose to emphasize the ] space,
and radical, while the rest of theses), into brackets, separated from the content in-between the rest of the ] space) closer to protect its borders.
This systematic set of these
[fields] of society imposes through its borders.
This fields] of society imposes that we do as the text.
Society imposes too much, our relation can grow autonomy(
(Brackets, separated from the one we want to theses), into (parenthesis), others are busy structures through its borders.
This systematic set of divis (
